[maximus]

Interesting,seems the "majority" of states either have them legal for the handicapped or during gun season otherwise illegal. No wonder the pros always refer to ohio,it's one of the few or "minority"[hihi]
I find it interesting aswell that many of the states that allow them have strict guidelines on limb width,bolt size,etc. I guess they're not as well recieved as the pros have stated,but I'm sure I must be caught up in a myth or more fear mongering[rofl]

 

[maximus]

Some data is out-dated. Things changing in several states. Stay tuned for the next few years

Some states have other issues pending. Some are legislative, others are expanding and others looking into the concept.

Kathy
Then what you're saying is pure speculation,just list the facts and data,everything we've stated you pros call speculation and not facts and ask for data not opinion. Now let me ask you a simple question since this is something I've heard repeatedly from you pros. Don't side step and don't give opinion,just yes or no to this fact. According to the current data listed,Do the majority of states support full inclusion? Yes or No And don't tell me times are changing,that once again is speculation,just answer the question.

 

[maximus]

[

No, they don't.

hunfishnj at least you can admit a obvious fact

Kathy,you simply avoid the question like a politician,if you can't admit an obvious simple fact how could someone believe anything you have to say let alone think your unbaised.

and they will join the list of the states that don't have their heads up their asses

So until up to now,it's the majority of states that have there head up there asses just because they don't support for full inclusion. I think all those DNR's have a little more commen sense than you.

 

[maximus]

i know the anti-cb group don't like it but the extra hunters will bring millions of dollars into the f&g department.

Way off muzzyman,how do you bring in millions when exsisting hunters crossing over aren't buying something extra. If it's full inclusion,guys don't need a permit or even a differant lisence,so the only "extra" revenue is from new hunters. If 10000 new hunters join us next year that's only $315000. So,if money is what they need,a special permit for a additional season is the fiscally responsible decision for xbows. Now 10000 new or exsisting{exsisting is the key] would generate $620000. So I guess F&G should evaluate which brings in more cash since you pros say they need it that bad,and they'd be doing themselves a dis-service by not having a seaparate season.Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

 

[maximus]

i'm not denying my bias for crossbows and i'll point to whatever i can to further the pro side

Well muzzyman,I have to respect the fact that you openly admit it and don't hide behind the "I'm for all hunters" talking points most pros use. However,I'd still like to know how full inclusion will generate millions for F&G.

 

[maximus]

If you think that saying they should allow x-bows for economic reasons and to generate more cash flow, it would make all to much sense for them to sell seperate tags and licenses, hence crossbow should have it's own seperate season.

Seems I just asked a simiar question[hihi]yet still no responce Hmmmmmmmm Question is Why didn't F&G consider this since they're so financially strapped,someone dropped the ball.

 

[maximus]

According to the current data listed,Do the majority of states support full inclusion? Yes or No And don't tell me times are changing,that once again is speculation,just answer the question.

Still waiting for your responce Kathy

 

[maximus]

I did comment that the list had some outdated info. Note the following changes:

Don't blame outdated info,The addition of two more states doesn't change anything,they are still the minority and again you elude the question. You ought to run for a political office Kathy cause your double talk would fit right in. You are so bias that you can't even admit a simple FACT. You're pathetic,I use to respect you however YOU not being able to admit this simple fact shows nothing you say has any substance to it,project whatever you want cause you've just proved its either hearsay or just lies.

Am a non-hunter who is PRO hunting supporting what YOU like to do!

This should read as follows
A non-hunter bent on furthering the xbow agenda with lies and double talk supporting those who support xbows.

 

[maximus]

Full inclusion of CrossBOWS IS in the minority right now. But as the Anti Crossbowers say, the RASH is spreading.

Hello NS911,hope you're doing well,glad to see YOU could at least admit it. Don't worry we have oitment for that rash,as well as many hunters in other states. BTW how's your recovery going?


Kathy,are you at a point here of being to "proud" to admit the same fact that other pros have or are you still playing politician[hihi]