cross bows are very accurate at much farther distances, so . . . will we be wearing hunter orange while cross bows are in the woods so that we don't get mistaken for deer?
Crossbows are more accurate at longer distance because they are easier to shoot...it's more a function of ease of shooting than the weapons capability. Compound arrows can travel just about as far, but it's nearly impossible to shoot 3 or 4 inch groups at 75 yards with a compound. With a crossbow, 4 inch groups can be done 15 minutes after taking it out of the box( I just wintessed that a few weeks ago in Ohio). This is because they are shoulder fired, can be bench rested, have scopes...just like guns. They are not hand-held, hand-drawn.
Accuracy with a bow is totally dependent on the shooters function, not so with a crossbow...it's locked and loaded, mounted on a stock, telescopic sights, and can be bench rested to shoot accurately at long distances.
The range is comparable to a compound, and only marginally better with a crossbow. The big difference is that while an arrow from a compound can kill a deer at 75 yards, very few people, if anyone, could actually hit a deer at 75 yards with a bow. With the new crossbows, those bolts will zip through a deer at 75 yards, and just about anyone can do it within 15 to 20 minutes of opening the box...just like a gun.
That being said, crossbow bolts my fly faster and have alot more KE, but they still cannot bust through brush. The hunter will still need to have a clear lane to the target. It only poses a threat when fired from the ground, and it's really not much more of a threat than shooting a bow from the ground. We may end up having to wear hunter orange for bow hunting while gun season are in as well, but that is because the woods are already over-crowded, not because of crossbows.
The danger in not having a safety course is that crossbows require gun-handling safety procedures, not safe bow handling procedures. There are special unloading steps to follow, there are things you have to do with corssbows that you do not do with bows. If an 11 or 12 year old kid who passed his bow test last year, doesn't want to, or have the time to practice, gets his parents to buy him a crossbow, he can just go use it without an instruction on safety or proper use.
Now, we would all hope that the parents would be responsible enough to ensure the youth hunter does things right, but we should all know the difference between hoping all parents are responsible, and the sad reality of how many actually
are responsible.
In the end, it comes down to the fact that the State has permitted (or will be permitting) this to happen. They have decided that this hunter doesn't need to know anything different about crossbows than he/she needs to know about a bow to take it afield, and some parents will think that is good enough.
The Division may even be liable if some tradegy does happen. Think about it this way...if some 17 year old kid just got his license, then the next year wanted to drive a motorcyle, and the state just gave him a license without testing or giving the saefty course, do you think they
could be liable for giving that license in the even of an accident?
Lawyers would be lining up for that case, don't ya think?