New Jersey Hunters banner
1 - 20 of 50 Posts

nightstalker911

· Registered
Joined
·
9,149 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
By LARRY WOODY
Staff Writer

Until last season, hunting deer with crossbows had been illegal in Tennessee except for people with physical disabilities.

Last year, the law was changed to permit the use of crossbows by all archers,
and Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency deer specialist Daryl Ratajczak said any initial negative reaction mostly has evaporated and hunter response has been overwhelmingly positive.

"We did a statewide
survey of outdoorsmen and one of the questions was whether they thought the use of crossbows had a negative impact on hunting," Ratajczak said. "Ninety-one percent said no."

About 90,000 Tennessee archers will take to the woods when the state's deer archery season opens Sept. 23.

By comparison, some 200,000 hunters annually participate in the deer gun seasons.

Last season Tennessee archers bagged 20,146 deer, 3,800 of which where taken with crossbows.

The previous season — when crossbows were not permitted — archers harvested 19,331 deer.

"The use of crossbows did not have a significant impact on the harvest ," Ratajczak said.

"A lot of the deer taken with crossbows would have been harvested by hunters using traditional bows."

Ratajczak said the TWRA supported the legalization of crossbows, "because it makes it possible for more people to hunt. A lot of hunters who technically are not physically disabled still may have trouble drawing a traditional hunting bow. Using a crossbow makes it possible for them to continue hunting."

Some feel that a crossbow is more accurate — especially for less-practiced bow hunters — resulting in surer shots and cleaner kills.

If the crossbow has so many positives and no negatives, why was it banned?

"It was mostly a matter of tradition," Ratajczak said. "Traditions are hard to change."

Veteran outdoorsman Gil Lackey, who hunts with a traditional bow, admitted he was initially biased against crossbows.

"I didn't like the idea at first," he said. "I thought it would give too much advantage to the crossbow hunter. I have since come around. I have some older friends who loved bow-hunting but had to give it up because their bodies just couldn't manage the bow poundage.

"Now they have a chance to do what they love again. Using a crossbow still requires getting close enough to the deer for a good shot, so it qualifies as ethical in my book."
 
Discussion starter · #2 ·
Last year, the law was changed to permit the use of crossbows by all archers,
and Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency deer specialist Daryl Ratajczak said any initial negative reaction mostly has evaporated and hunter response has been overwhelmingly positive.

"We did a statewide
survey of outdoorsmen and one of the questions was whether they thought the use of crossbows had a negative impact on hunting," Ratajczak said. "Ninety-one percent said no."
Image
Interesting

Last season Tennessee archers bagged 20,146 deer, 3,800 of which where taken with crossbows.

The previous season — when crossbows were not permitted — archers harvested 19,331 deer.

"The use of crossbows did not have a significant impact on the harvest ," Ratajczak said.
Image


Some feel that a crossbow is more accurate — especially for less-practiced bow hunters — resulting in surer shots and cleaner kills.
And this is WRONG ? [confused]

If the crossbow has so many positives and no negatives, why was it banned?

"It was mostly a matter of tradition," Ratajczak said. "Traditions are hard to change."
YEP !

Veteran outdoorsman Gil Lackey, who hunts with a traditional bow, admitted he was initially biased against crossbows.

"I didn't like the idea at first," he said. "I thought it would give too much advantage to the crossbow hunter. I have since come around. I have some older friends who loved bow-hunting but had to give it up because their bodies just couldn't manage the bow poundage.

"Now they have a chance to do what they love again. Using a crossbow still requires getting close enough to the deer for a good shot, so it qualifies as ethical in my book."

Now they have a chance to do what they love again.
AMEN !!!!!!!!!
 
Discussion starter · #6 ·
Another State reporting a POSITIVE outcome to the FULL inclusion of CrossBOWS into thier hunting seasons, and NO one has any negative comments [confused]
I guess when I forward this Article up to the Div. and Council, I can attach a note saying the that these results were not disputed by the Hunters here.[up]
 
Discussion starter · #8 ·
Another State reporting a POSITIVE outcome to the FULL inclusion of CrossBOWS into thier hunting seasons, and NO one has any negative comments
I guess when I forward this Article up to the Div. and Council, I can attach a note saying the that these results were not disputed by the Hunters here
E-mailed and Snail mailed to Trenton.
 
no dispute paul because no1 cares:D letters have been sent to f&g the council and to state representatives and legislatures by us so called anti crossbow coalition ...good luck:D
 
Discussion starter · #12 ·
I know they've been watching other States, so they will be glad to see that yet another State included CrossBOWS without any problems.
And your list will give then the people to call about "WHAT HAPPEN WHEN CROSSBOWS WERE INCLUDED":
Hunter numbers up(retained and recruited), no seasons shortened, no "decimation" of the deer herd, and MORE LICENSE and Permit sales = $$$$$ [eek]
And they will find that these other States experienced the same type of CrossBOW opposition, that ended up fading away when they were included, and all the "HYPED" fears, DIDN'T HAPPEN.

Thanks, I was going to send them a list of States that have already included CrossBOWS WITH NO PROBLEMS, but you beat me to it. [up]
 
I didn't send them that list. Im sure they already had it before you guys sent it. I just reminding them of a few things they may have forgot about while there head were fill with dollar signs. That's all.
 
I know they've been watching other States, so they will be glad to see that yet another State included CrossBOWS without any problems.
And your list will give then the people to call about "WHAT HAPPEN WHEN CROSSBOWS WERE INCLUDED":
Hunter numbers up(retained and recruited), no seasons shortened, no "decimation" of the deer herd, and MORE LICENSE and Permit sales = $$$$$
And they will find that these other States experienced the same type of CrossBOW opposition, that ended up fading away when they were included, and all the "HYPED" fears, DIDN'T HAPPEN.
[up][up][up]

It's what NEVER happens (but is always predicted) that WILL make the difference just as it has so often before (and That list grows each and every year for a reason) :D
 
letters have been sent to f&g the council and to state representatives and legislatures by us so called anti crossbow coalition ...good luck
Good luck to you, I'm sure those six (or so) letters will carry much weight compared to over 700 positive survey results.....[lol]
 
Last season Tennessee archers bagged 20,146 deer, 3,800 of which where taken with crossbows.

The previous season — when crossbows were not permitted — archers harvested 19,331 deer.
So 90,000 "archers" havested 20,146 deer with only and additional 3,800 taken by crossbow hunters?

Shit that doesn't seem too bad...They have a harvest success rate of 22%...

Let's see...in 2007-2008 34,000 NJ BOWHUNTERS killed 17,312 deer....or 51% success rate...

So lets do some reckinin'...

"YOU" xgun proponents have stated that xguns will make millions of dollars for NJDF&W...for DF&W to realize JUST ONE "MILLION" from xguns would introduce and extra 31,746 indiviuals into the bow seasons...Yup...there it is ACE...your boy Paul states:
$31.50 X 30,000 = $945,000
And these have to be "NEW" hunters to bowseasons; or the DF&W will realize LESS $$$ than what Wells has predicted...

Lets do more math...31,746 "NEW" people into bowseasons + the 34,000 true bowhunters = 65,746 people in bowseasons...lets say you get SOME crossover...

We'll say 64,746 hunters in the bowseasons....

Ready...more math...

IF the 51% success rate continues...32,640 deer will be harvested during the bowseasons...

IF SAY the xgun hunters really suck...51%(B) + 22%(X) = 73%(B+X) / 2 = 36.5% success rate or 23,632 deer killed...

Anyway you add it up...it looks like E-A-B & shortened bowseasons to me...
 
Come on Ace...I'm waiting...where are your consecutive multipule posts in all CAPS at?
 
I'm sure those six (or so) letters will carry much weight compared to over 700 positive survey results.....
There were over 500 addressed & signed postcards opposed to xguns filled out just at Whittingham...six (or so) letters...Ace you slay me! You're such a sharp!
 
1 - 20 of 50 Posts