Can't seem to find anything on it. Rumors flying it may happen...anyone have any info that's not hearsay or speculation? (Or post a link to the thread if I already missed it). Thanks all, and stay warm out there.
No backup weapons. ...Just a second arrow In all honesty I think over playing the danger here. Any wild animal thats been shot is dangerous not just bears.Great, now that's a useful reply! Your experience on follow ups is interesting, not what I would expect. As someone else asked, when you do follow up, is someone carrying a firearm?
Neither are the people who would oppose bow hunting bear (which does not include me, but I do have the concern I stated). But are you saying, a bow is as efficient as a slug gun?
My ass not efficient. When I picked my bear skin up at the taxidermist he had a bucket full of 12 and 20 gauge slugs, buckshot and birdshot that he had pulled out of bears from seasons past. (Meaning old wounds not fresh) Like anything the weapon is only as efficient as the person shooting it!It's just not as efficient a weapon. In a populated area, with dangerous game that could kill you, it's not a simple matter of back out until the morning.
Yet some hunters will never get that. It is true regardless of weapon type. A Rage through the guts is no better than a fixed head through the gutsLike anything the weapon is only as efficient as the person shooting it!
Which is why I will be carrying 2 arrows in my quiver. [hihi]No backup weapons. ...Just a second arrow
SAY WHAT???? the military uses guns because you can't shoot people a mile away with a bow. And we wonder why the antis are kicking our asses.There's a reason the military uses guns and not bows (except Rambo). The gun is just more efficient. I agree that in the right hands, a bow can be as effective a tool for hunting but more can go wrong at the time of the shot, whether its things beyond the shooter's control, like deflection, or something like bear "fever". It's not the "Fred Bear's" out there that concern me.
Correct and likely more than possible.I've spoken with 2 guys from F&G. Both said that it won't happen for 2015 and only 1 said that it's POSSIBLE for 2016.
Settle down now. We had a reasonable discussion and someone with a lot of experience showed that my concern is probably not justified. I'm satisfied with that. As far as gun vs. bow. I always aim for shoulder bone with a slug. You don't shoot for bone with a bow for a reason. Let's not bs ourselves. What antis are kicking our asses anyway?SAY WHAT???? the military uses guns because you can't shoot people a mile away with a bow. And we wonder why the antis are kicking our asses.
Dude wtf? Have you ever bow hunted bears? Very obviously not. You're prob well intentioned but way wrong. The only thing that dies easier when hit with an arrow than a bear is a rabbit. Commonly going less than 40 yards often 15-20. Believe it or not that is absolute fact. Archery tackle is an extremely effecient manner and humane way of hunting.It's just not as efficient a weapon. In a populated area, with dangerous game that could kill you, it's not a simple matter of back out until the morning.
You have zero idea what you're talking about. Do a poll averaging how far bears ran when hit through the lungs w bow and w a gun of any gauge or caliber n you'll see how wrong you are. Guys are entitled to opinions I'll givr that but you should learn factsThere's a reason the military uses guns and not bows (except Rambo). The gun is just more efficient. I agree that in the right hands, a bow can be as effective a tool for hunting but more can go wrong at the time of the shot, whether its things beyond the shooter's control, like deflection, or something like bear "fever". It's not the "Fred Bear's" out there that concern me.
I think this arrow was pretty effective for me.
Good stuff, fingers and all! Lifes a little better now with thermacells, I remember my first bear hunts around 2001-2002 being covered in net head-toe and the black flies still tore us up!