New Jersey Hunters banner
121 - 140 of 286 Posts
I guess believing in The Lord and the bible makes me a ignorant Christian

First, the Biblical teaching that homosexuality is a sin is not a human prejudice—it is the Word of God!!!


Second, if we are to truly live according to the law that Christ gave us, then we absolutely must preach against all forms of sin which undermine society, corrupt the morals of our youth and bring God's judgment upon our families and nation.


Third, the problem of homosexuality is not rooted in fear and lack of awareness by Christians, but rather, it is rooted in the homosexual's lack of fear for God, for “by the fear of the LORD men depart from evil” (Proverbs 16:6).


Fourth, Christians aren't hiding ignorance and prejudice behind a guise of morality; but rather, homosexuals have rejected God's morality. I dare you to find even one homosexual who takes a stand for morals.


Fifth, the religious community aren't the one's abusing the Scriptures; but rather, it is homosexuals who are trying desperately to change the Word of God into a lie to legitimatize a sin that is abominable in the sight of God almighty.


romans 1:24-25,
The Bible is a storybook meant to help us live decent lives. It's neither history nor law. If you're going to be a hardass about one aspect I would hope you stick to all of the other equally ridiculous rules, such as:

Leviticus 19:27 “Ye shall not round the corners of your heads.”

Leviticus 19:27 “Neither shalt thou mar the corners of thy beard."

Leviticus 5:2 “If a soul touch any unclean thing, whether it be a carcase of an unclean beast, or a carcase of unclean cattle, or the carcase of unclean creeping things, and if it be hidden from him; he also shall be unclean, and guilty.”

Leviticus 12:4–5 “And she shall then continue in the blood of her purifying three and thirty days; she shall touch no hallowed thing, nor come into the sanctuary, until the days of her purifying be fulfilled. But if she bear a maid child, then she shall be unclean two weeks, as in her separation: and she shall continue in the blood of her purifying threescore and six days.”

They're either all real, or all bs. You don't get to pick and choose.
 
Yep, so they blame the gays for societies ills, and that is the result. Well done.
Nope. I don't blame gays for anything. I say live and let live. However when they start to promote a knowingly dangerous and destructive lifestyle to our children or the public in general that's where I start to take issue.
 
Nope. I don't blame gays for anything. I say live and let live. However when they start to promote a knowingly dangerous and destructive lifestyle to our children or the public in general that's where I start to take issue.
And how are the "gays" dangerous and destructive to the children or public? You keep saying these things, I'm waiting for the evidence. I'd also like you to again look at this...
“These rates are staggering, and highlight the cost of pervasive anti-gay stigmatization and victimization,
and actually give a real effort this time. Surely you can do that, after all, it was YOUR link.
 
And how are the "gays" dangerous and destructive to the children or public? You keep saying these things, I'm waiting for the evidence. I'd also like you to again look at this... and actually give a real effort this time. Surely you can do that, after all, it was YOUR link.
First off, don't twist my words. I said "promote a knowingly dangerous and destructive lifestyle to our children or the public in general". I didn't say gays were dangerous, their behavior is, and that is simply fact. It's one thing to be accepting of gays, which I am, it's another thing to try and pretend that their lifestyle is simply another healthy lifestyle when it's anything but. That's where the danger lies and that is the message that is being pumped in to our schools and in to our homes via the MSM. There is never mention of the health risks involved with homosexuality and that is not only irresponsible but dangerous to impressionable minds.

Looking at numbers like 1 in 5 gay men are infected with HIV is your evidence. The evidence is in the numbers and there are many other examples I could point to. I just gave you a bunch of links to statistics that prove my point.

“These rates are staggering, and highlight the cost of pervasive anti-gay stigmatization and victimization,
This is an opinion, I only draw my conclusions on this subject from facts.
 
flat9999 said:
You can say that without consequence, but only if you are NOT a Christian.
Muslims will call for a public stoning, Jews forbid it as an abomination, a Christian says that he disagrees with it.
Only one of these responses is considered hateful. Go figure.
darrenf said:
Try again. They are all hateful.
Disagreeing with someone, or what someone does is NOT hateful, it is simply disagreeing.


I don't even know what to say if you can't follow your OWN train of thought. Maybe you should read that again, I reposted it for you to make it easy, I'm helpful like that. [ko]
 
Why is there this need for every person in America to agree with and support homosexuality or else they're a bigot? The man said he does not judge gays he just doesn't agree with it. It is possible to disagree with a person's lifestyle and still treat them with dignity and respect.

It's ironic that the people who are supposedly so tolerant of others are completely intolerant of any viewpoints contrary to theirs. I am a fairly open-minded person but this whole attitude of "support this on our terms or else" is starting to wear thin on me.
 
Tolerance goes both ways and while I don't agree with Phil's opinions, he's still entitled to them. My family is a huge fan of the show, yet I'm an atheist. I'm neither offended by nor intolerant of the blessings they give at the end of every show. America needs to lighten the "f" up!!!
 
First off, don't twist my words. I said "promote a knowingly dangerous and destructive lifestyle to our children or the public in general". I didn't say gays were dangerous, their behavior is, and that is simply fact. It's one thing to be accepting of gays, which I am, it's another thing to try and pretend that their lifestyle is simply another healthy lifestyle when it's anything but. That's where the danger lies and that is the message that is being pumped in to our schools and in to our homes via the MSM. There is never mention of the health risks involved with homosexuality and that is not only irresponsible but dangerous to impressionable minds.

Looking at numbers like 1 in 5 gay men are infected with HIV is your evidence. The evidence is in the numbers and there are many other examples I could point to. I just gave you a bunch of links to statistics that prove my point.
Your links did no such thing, it's obvious you didn't read them, as the second sentence of the first link I clicked on challenged your point. I am not twisting anyone's words. No need for that here, you're doing a fine job yourself.

1-5, wow. So what? Wanna take a guess how many people have HPV? Sounds like you need to take a statistics course.
 
This will end this retardation... A&E has the right to do anything it wishes as it is a private company. You can agree or disagree but ultimately it's their choice.

It's just like in your house, what you say goes...
 
Why is there this need for every person in America to agree with and support homosexuality or else they're a bigot?
Because that is their tactic to squelch any dissenting opinion. They used to call people witches and burn them at the stake if they didn't like what you said. The Communists would haul you off to a gulag if you dared speak against the state message. Now they just try to shame you, ruin your career, and drag your reputation through the mud to accomplish their goals. It's cultural Marxism and that's just how it works.
 
Your links did no such thing, it's obvious you didn't read them, as the second sentence of the first link I clicked on challenged your point. I am not twisting anyone's words. No need for that here, you're doing a fine job yourself.

1-5, wow. So what? Wanna take a guess how many people have HPV? Sounds like you need to take a statistics course.
I'm not talking about HPV. I'm talking about HIV and the astronomical chance you will contract it if you engage in homosexual sex. Good try though to change the subject. How about the fact that gays, who make up only 2% of the population, account for 63% of primary and secondary syphilis cases in the United States. How about the astronomical rates of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and hepatitis? Don't you think promoting that type of lifestyle to children as healthy is a bit misleading?
 
Not only is the man entitled to his opinion I'd rather hear the truth from him than all the political correctness going around that equates to lies and hidden agendas. Like him or not, at least you know where he's coming from and that's a lot more I can say for those acting like they are the squeaky clean, perfectly behaved, voices of the people. Friggin' soulless robots.

I signed the Bring Phil Back petition on https://www.change.org/petitions/a-e-network-bring-phil-robertson-back

Over 80,000 signature so far.
 
I'm not talking about HPV. I'm talking about HIV and the astronomical chance you will contract it if you engage in homosexual sex. Good try though to change the subject. How about the fact that gays, who make up only 2% of the population, acoount for 63% of primary and secondary syphilis cases in the United States. How about the astronomical rates of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and hepatitis? Don't you think promoting that type of lifestyle to children as healthy is a bit misleading?
Of course you're not talking about HPV, because the fact that almost every sexually active person will get it at some time will ruin your point. Classic cherry picking. Not changing the subject at all. Again, I'd like to know how you equate it to the "gay" lifestyle. Is unprotected sex the "gay" lifestyle? Is it having many partners? Because those are the true reasons for the rates of STD infection, not the partner they choose. Are two uninfected gay men in a monogamous relationship at a higher risk for infection then a monogamous heterosexual couple? If not, then your point is invalid.

And, I am still waiting to see if Grimace is behind this "promoting that type of lifestyle to children".
 
it occurs in nature all the time..If evidence exists for homosexual relationships in nature, then by definition it is natural. Correct?
Not "all the time." In approximatly 10% of nature from what I've read, although I would agree with the studies that put it at a far lesser percentage. Yes, it's natural, but it's a naturally occurring abberation of the normal state of things. So because someone's faith and belief system is that it's not "normal", A&E puts him on hiatus? Sorry, but that's the last time I watch such an intolerant network. Letters to advertisers to follow.
 
121 - 140 of 286 Posts