New Jersey Hunters banner
21 - 40 of 47 Posts
Discussion starter · #22 ·
oh and as an FYI I spoke with someone in Chanda's office yesterday, they will be sending him and the Chief my question and i hope to hear from them soon.
 
Maybe during the bear hunt you'll meet some men and women employees of xxxxxxxx
In my group of hunting buddies heading up there are a dozen NJ LEO's. I'm sure there will be LOTS more going up as well to enjoy the bear/deer week.
I would love to know what the "private security" is contracted to do. Anything, and I mean ANYTHING that disturbs, distracts, or infringes upon my hunt or the hunts of my companions in any way will be met with a hunter harassment complaint. If they do this while armed, well that just opens up a whole other can of worms.. such as Possession of a weapon for an unlawful purpose. (IE: committing a harassment while in possession of a weapon)
I wonder how many of these so-called "proactive and highly professional" people are willing to risk their right to carry, possess and own weapons. Not to mention going to jail for an indictable offense.
Susan, please come up with a new rap about the bear hunt. I need something to whistle while I'm dragging my TROPHY out of the woods.
 
anyone know where the APLNJ came up with this figure?
Lets face it you can throw out any number you care to (a Dr. Evel ransome number comes to mind here)any "Fact" you want when you are never forced to prove what you say and the likes of the animal rights extreemists never have to do that I don't care if it's one of the wacky nutjobs from the BEAR Group or Jeff Tittle from the NJ Chapter of the Sierra club.
The "Press" never calls them on their crap and that is part of the problem as they can repeat faslehoods untill they become a popular perseption.
 
Thanks for the info JackDaniels [up] I was going to hunt in NW NJ, but maybe I should hunt up in Waywayanda SP behind that nasty old c*nt's house instead. Sounds like that looney toon has been feeding the bears for years and they may be used to humans, so it should be easy to put a slug thru one of their hearts [kiss]
 
In response to huntfishNJ post dated 19 Aug. 2010, 8:54 AM. Your post is quite alarming to me.
You are alarmed that I said if my hunt is disturbed in any way that a hunter harassment complaint will be followed? Why?

The other quotes you put in your post are not me, or in any way, shape or form related to me or my hunting practices. I hunt in the woods, couldn't care less where you live, and never suggested hunting anywhere near your property.
"NJ Bear-a-thon in Waywayanda State Park!"
I didn't say this, but I agree. That's a big area, has many quality trophy-class bears, and a bear-a-thon there is a wonderful idea for some people. Again, this has NOTHING to do with your property.
p.s. I put the "trophy-class" designation there because I know how the whole 'trophy' end of the argument drives some people crazy. I personally can't wait to eat my next bear, probably as a roast with carrots and taters. I may just do it sitting on my new rug. I'll be sure to put it nose to nose with my old one so they don't get lonely. Or maybe I'll just throw out the old one to make room for the new and to infuriate animal-rights wackos, anti-hunting, anti-reality people who troll this forum.
 
This is the second time I am asking you not to discuss me on a public internet forum.
Discuss whom? Jack Daniels is your name, isn't it? I love Jack Daniels. Whiskey (helps to lessen the impact of dating ugly women), BBQ sauce (great on bears), clothing (for NASCAR events), home goods (great for filling with the whiskey and drinking it).

JACK DANIELS JACK DANIELS JACK DANIELS!!!! Yum yum.

You should stay behind the mask of that name. You wouldn't want to be compared to that hideously ugly creature in the pictures, would you?
 
Discussion starter · #35 ·
This is the second time I am asking you not to discuss me on a public internet forum.

what part of "public forum" do you not understand? and if you do nto want to be discussed on a public forum maybe you should not post on, make thinly veiled threats on, and come to start trouble on, an internet...public...forum...


and this goes for your No2ChrisChristie name on the DR forums......


so tell us a third time Susie...
 
This is the second time I am asking you not to discuss me on a public internet forum.
So let me get this strait... You post incoherent anti-hunting dribble on a pro-hunting website and you complain that people are "discussing" you on the very same site?

No one forced you to troll here. If you don't like what people are saying about you, well that's just too bad.Try growing a thicker skin.

If that's the best you can do, whine about not getting your childish way, it's no wonder you and your fellow anti's are so ineffective on public policy and just about everything else.
 
Discussion starter · #38 ·
Amazing.[rofl][rofl][rofl][wallmad][wallmad][wallmad] Ant just posted this article a little bit ago. So the $600,000 has absolutely nothing to do with the hunt at all. Ironically, the $600,000 did pay for the failed non-lethal management plan that the BEAR group has been pushing for the last 5 years.
 
Related"The cost to taxpayers will be zero," Chanda said, because "All of the cost to administer the hunt will be paid by hunters" through their license (not bear permit) fees.

Last year, the Division got about $600,000 from the state for all black bear management, including research, law enforcement and wildlife control work, but that amount was eliminated this year. Most of the Division's budget comes from a dedicated fund, where revenue from hunters and fishermen can go only toward fish and wildlife costs.
There goes those pesky FACTS raining on your parade of lies again "Susie boozey" aka "Jack Daniels" :D
 
21 - 40 of 47 Posts