Quick question for any hunter that chooses to answer. With so much distrust in F&G, why do most hunters insist on only quoting data supplied by F&G and their employees(state biologists)? Surely, if hunting is such a clear and great success you must have many more sources you can cite as proof of such. Second, again referring to the distrust in F&G. Why are hunters so terrified of a new animal management council? A council with representation of hunters, ARAs and everyone else?